FORCE2015 observations & notes
LINCS Information Framework (LIFE)
Training Course - ISO 16363 - Digital Repository Auditing
Trusty URIs: Verifiable, Immutable, and Permanent Digital Artifacts for Linked Data
My Talk @ Beyond the PDF 1
Wireless & Mobile Technology: The future of content communication
Four Postulates for Diagrams as Semantic Data Carriers in Scientific Publications
conTEXT: Exploiting Linked Data for Content Analysis
DFG-Project: Future Publications in the Humanities (Fu-PusH)
10 Simple Rules for the Care and Feeding of Scientific Data
Resource Identification Initiative
Meeting on "Publish or perish? The future of scholarly publishing and careers"
Sayeed Choudhury reflects on the research data revolution
Utilising organic search (SEO) for wider content exposure
SobekCM Digital Repository Software
OMERO - Open Microscopy Environment Remote Objects
OME-TIFF; Open Microscopy Environment Tagged Image File Format
Europe PubMed Central
ESIP Data Management Training for Scientists
How a little bit of technology can fix the editing and production processes for the social sciences.
CiteAb: The Antibody Search Engine
What will future publications be like?
GROTOAP: Ground Truth for Open Access Publications
IBM Announcing the IMPROVER Network Verification Challenge
Adobe Forms Central
NaCTeM - National Center for Text Mining
ckan - The open source data portal software
CBOX (Commons in a Box)
Scholarly Open Access
DOAJ - Director of Open Access Journals
ROARMAP: Registry of Open Access Repositories Mandatory Archiving Policies
Open Provenance Model Vocabulary
JISC Open Citations
GENIA Project: Mining literature for knowledge in molecular biology
UK PubMed Central
ISA Infrastructure for Managing Experimental Metadata
Data management “Starting at Ground-Zero” event OHSU in Portland, OR
BRDI Announces Data and Information Challenge
Vivo hiring Director
If We Share Data, Will Anyone Use Them? Data Sharing and Reuse in the Long Tail of Science and Technology
Currently the process of communicating scholarship can be considered to be disjoint. The interface between scholar, publisher, editor, reviewer, custodian, and consumer (as examples of stakeholders) is not seamless. This has become more pronounced as we have moved from an analog (print) to digital (on-line) mode of communicating scholarship. Components that were defined for an era of analog-only communication persist. The disjoint process impacts the speed of delivery, the quality of the product, and the availability of the scholarship.
Whether the cause or the effect, the underlying information systems supporting digital information are to blame. For example, how we maintain information in the laboratory is varied, ranging from disjoint Word documents, to Evernote to sophisticated laboratory management systems, none of which interface well with the publisher's journal management systems. The end result is to restrict what scholarship is available and how it is available.
Existing workflow systems are a step in the right direction as they better capture the process of research acting as both productivity tools and tools leading to better reproducibility and persistence of research. What would seem to be required is a soup to nuts set of interoperable components deal with process of communicating scholarship. As such they might be perceived as overlapping other target areas addressed by FORCE11 (Authoring, Markup, Containers and Reward Systems), but processes are really the glue that holds them together.